<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://my.facilitiesnet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>BetterBricks - Bottom Line Thinking on Energy - All Comments</title><link>http://my.facilitiesnet.com/myfacilitiesnet_blogs/b/betterbricks/default.aspx</link><description>A building (the one you&amp;#39;re in, or dreaming up) is a business asset.  As vital to the bottom line as a signed contract.  As essential as a prized client.  It can attract employees.  Humble competitors.  Inspire tenants.  Boost productivity.  Leave a le</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 5.6.582.12783 (Build: 5.6.582.12783)</generator><item><title>re: Best O&amp;M Practices for Major Equipment </title><link>http://my.facilitiesnet.com/myfacilitiesnet_blogs/b/betterbricks/archive/2009/04/23/best-o-amp-m-practices-for-major-equipment.aspx#6182</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:34:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8cc9bc4f-6f4a-43a1-a627-f7a2930a1001:6182</guid><dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;If you want more in-depth information about how to deal with energy optimization for motors, I suggest that you click on the website link attached.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://my.facilitiesnet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6182" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Building Owner Advice:  Best Practice O&amp;M Program</title><link>http://my.facilitiesnet.com/myfacilitiesnet_blogs/b/betterbricks/archive/2009/06/12/building-owner-advice-best-practice-o-amp-m-program.aspx#5417</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:29:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8cc9bc4f-6f4a-43a1-a627-f7a2930a1001:5417</guid><dc:creator>Peter Cholakis</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent information. &amp;nbsp;I am always suprised that O &amp;amp; M is not treated as a core strategic issue by many sectors... including healthcare. &amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bottom line... operational costs represent 90% of total building costs and facility costs are typically second only to personnel costs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lastly, linking the build environment to the organizations mission is critical ... and don&amp;#39;t get me started on how many firms don&amp;#39;t do this!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://my.facilitiesnet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5417" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Your Guide to Uncovering Energy Savings </title><link>http://my.facilitiesnet.com/myfacilitiesnet_blogs/b/betterbricks/archive/2009/04/10/your-guide-to-uncovering-energy-savings.aspx#4735</link><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 16:49:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8cc9bc4f-6f4a-43a1-a627-f7a2930a1001:4735</guid><dc:creator>John Cockerill</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Most systems are designed for design degree day temperatures. 15 degrees F.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are controls that can balance the system at the boiler level and at the zone level.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Most folks are not knowledgable in this area.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Folks also redisgn workspace without adjusting BTU distribution and control to that space. &amp;nbsp;This can be suttle and very uncomfortable.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://my.facilitiesnet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4735" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: School District Strikes it Rich with Commissioning</title><link>http://my.facilitiesnet.com/myfacilitiesnet_blogs/b/betterbricks/archive/2009/04/03/school-district-strikes-it-rich-with-commissioning.aspx#4480</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 19:03:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8cc9bc4f-6f4a-43a1-a627-f7a2930a1001:4480</guid><dc:creator>MikeJL</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Your post was very interesting to me, as I am currently studying the LEED for CI material, and your project addressed many of the credits. In the one school you used as an example you found $28,000 in savings over two years, with most of the savings in the first year. How much did it cost to get those savings? Including the cost of consultants, equipment, ongoing evaluation, etc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It has been somewhat challenging to get hard cost/benefit comparisons for many of the LEED credits, particularly the EQ items. With that said I haven&amp;#39;t done a lot of research on the subject, and would hope to get some real life feedback.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mike&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://my.facilitiesnet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4480" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Can   We Achieve 30 percent or Better? Yes we Can (and Have)</title><link>http://my.facilitiesnet.com/myfacilitiesnet_blogs/b/betterbricks/archive/2009/03/23/can-we-achieve-30-percent-or-better-yes-we-can-and-have.aspx#4213</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:43:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8cc9bc4f-6f4a-43a1-a627-f7a2930a1001:4213</guid><dc:creator>NEEA's BetterBricks Initiative</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed - this study has certainly instigated a great conversation around green building capabilities. &amp;nbsp;Here&amp;#39;s an interesting follow up from the president of NAIOP, Thomas Bisacquino, that ran on Globe Street. &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.globest.com/upclose/upclose/177464-1.html"&gt;www.globest.com/.../177464-1.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://my.facilitiesnet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4213" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Can   We Achieve 30 percent or Better? Yes we Can (and Have)</title><link>http://my.facilitiesnet.com/myfacilitiesnet_blogs/b/betterbricks/archive/2009/03/23/can-we-achieve-30-percent-or-better-yes-we-can-and-have.aspx#4209</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:58:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8cc9bc4f-6f4a-43a1-a627-f7a2930a1001:4209</guid><dc:creator>Greg Zimmerman</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks very much for the post. There seems to be a LOT of pushback in the industry against that NAIOP study and this post is clear summary of the industry&amp;#39;s opinion in general. Nicely done! &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://my.facilitiesnet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4209" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>
